From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 21 04:30:16 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCA116A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 04:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624F643D31
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 04:30:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny)
	by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp
	id 1AjHUr-000G9o-Bc; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:30:13 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: "alexis georges" <floating_in_space_@hotmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:21:11 -0500 .
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:30:13 +0200
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-Id: <E1AjHUr-000G9o-Bc@cs.huji.ac.il>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ACPI failure on 5.2 (Re: Timecounters and 5.2) 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:30:16 -0000

> ahh nice..so i am not the only one :)
> i disabled APIC like one of the guy said, and it boots perfectly..APIC is 
> only formultiple procesor machines right? Its not like disabling ACPI, 
> right?

I don't think so, since laptops also have/will/should have ACPI capabilities
(if that is the correct wording :)

> thanks anyways for pointing me to that

my pleasure

danny

> 
> 
> >From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
> >To: "alexis georges" <floating_in_space_@hotmail.com>
> >CC: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org
> >Subject: Re: ACPI failure on 5.2 (Re: Timecounters and 5.2) Date: Wed, 21 
> >Jan 2004 09:17:35 +0200
> >
> >wups, sorry, wrong pr,
> >see:
> >	http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59732
> >need my mornning coffee,
> >	danny
> >
> > > see:
> > > 	http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61239
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photos&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
>