From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jan 31 08:38:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA29711
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 08:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA29706
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 08:38:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA09671; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 09:38:05 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 09:38:05 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199701311638.JAA09671@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Josh MacDonald <jmacd@cs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Source code commits 
In-Reply-To: <199701311104.DAA01324@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <199701300216.TAA20836@phaeton.artisoft.com>
	<199701311104.DAA01324@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Josh MacDonald writes:
> Not only does CVS need a rewrite from scratch, it needs a 
> (re?)design from scratch.  For those of you aspiring to 
> do so, please note that I've got a pretty big head start and
> you can all wait for me to finish PRCS 2.0, I'm working on
> it as I write this.

You already know what I'd like (CVS mailing lists *grin*), but let me
state publically (outside of Greg's ear) that I think client/server is
a bigger issue than atomic locking and 'commit' locking.

But, feel free to address any of them you feel.

(If you feel like talking about it, I have some ideas you might be
interested in offline).



Nate