From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 3 02:15:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80061065683 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 02:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timur@bat.ru) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974308FC0A for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 02:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timur@bat.ru) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so853283rvf.43 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.201.1 with SMTP id y1mr4757789rvf.200.1215049693382; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.77.14 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7d743c270807021848r3c51559dw766fc249f873bc50@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 03:48:13 +0200 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Sender: timur@bat.ru To: "O. Hartmann" In-Reply-To: <485B9283.2050008@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <485A5939.1090108@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20080620075113.A44833@gwdu60.gwdg.de> <485B674B.9010404@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DDF1F@w2003s01.double-l.local> <485B9283.2050008@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 507a7d78248b6285 Cc: Johan Hendriks , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:15:22 -0000 On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:20 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Johan Hendriks wrote: >> >>>> Konrad Heuer wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> >>>>> We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to >>>>> CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? >>>> >>>> As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when Each new version of Samba has it's own bugs, so I prefer not to commit 0 day release versions, but wait, until it's got proven to be stable enough. Again, there are talks about 3.0.31 release due some new fixes... *sigh* With regards, Timur.