Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 11:48:41 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: kudzu@tenebras.com Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Numerous broken ports Message-ID: <20000430114841.A1129@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <390B16D2.38EB927D@dnai.com>; from kudzu@dnai.com on Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 10:07:30AM -0700 References: <390B0B02.47368F2A@dnai.com> <20000429185756.A48372@mithrandr.moria.org> <390B16D2.38EB927D@dnai.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Michael Sierchio (kudzu@dnai.com): > They shouldn't be included in the ports if they fail. There *is* a central The ports-tree is also a development tree, e.g. for the _packages_ that are included on the CD. Use theese packages, if you are unable to use development stuff. Packages _have been_ built (that's why they are included) and most of them are tested for functionality by hundreds of users everyday. I recommend reading the handbook and other FreeBSD resources. Alex -- I need a new ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000430114841.A1129>