From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 15:39:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7236837B409 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:39:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6563D43F3F for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 8749 invoked by uid 1000); 28 May 2003 22:39:44 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:39:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Larry Rosenman In-Reply-To: <7470000.1054160255@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> Message-ID: <20030528153505.S8722@root.org> References: <200305271919.h4RJJ5kd039145@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030527140850.V6550@root.org> <78350000.1054134139@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> <7470000.1054160255@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: re@freebsd.org cc: robert.moore@intel.com cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica - Imported sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:39:44 -0000 On Wed, 28 May 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > --On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 03:59:24 -0500 Larry Rosenman > >> Ok, with today's sources, I still get a page not present panic for > >> address (0x7) on transistion to battery. > > as a followup, with this code, I no longer get the panic at ACPI > > shutdown, just some messages about references. > > As a further followup, today's update of the ACPI sources get's rid of the > ACPI errors in the dmesg, but I ****STILL**** have the panic at 0x7 on > transition to battery. There's something wrong with your DSDT and/or the Intel acpica interpreter such that reference counting on ns objects is incorrect. > Is this going to be released like this? I'm doing my best as a volunteer. If none of us finds the problem before release, the answer is "yes". In that case, you should disable acpi or use apm. Or feel free to hunt down the problem yourself. -Nate