From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 2 11:03:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id LAA23791 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 11:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from jump.net (serv1-2.jump.net [204.238.120.19]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id LAA23786 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 11:03:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pbcustomer by jump.net (8.8.4/BERK-6.8.11) id NAA08472; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 13:03:12 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970102190413.006958c4@jump.net> X-Sender: adonai@jump.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 13:04:13 -0600 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" From: Lee Crites Subject: Re: Installation Problems Cc: Jean-Paul Nuytten , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 18:47 31-12-96 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >2.2-BETA (but if you could download it, you probably wouldn't have the >CD). Perhaps I'm strange this way, but *I* could have downloaded it but prefered to wait the two days for the cd's to show up. (thanks Walnut Creek!!) When I get a spare machine to play with/on, that might change. As it was, the ethernet card worked under Win3.1/Win95, but not FreeBSD (it was the 'new' smc9332). In the process of bringing my system up, I reinstalled the os at least 10 times. If I'd have tried to use the internet install, it would have been miserable. As it was, thanks to the installation program, it really wasn't that bad. I've still had some problems, but that's for another message. All I wanted to say was there are some of us who will wait for the CD, even if we have the latest and greatest available via internet. Lee