From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 8 11:13:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8BD1065673 for ; Fri, 8 May 2009 11:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f168.google.com (mail-fx0-f168.google.com [209.85.220.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD188FC19 for ; Fri, 8 May 2009 11:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so1332481fxm.43 for ; Fri, 08 May 2009 04:13:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hA6NsIZWjWw/p5IHPeB/vSVjo6OLtyAOWG/qTVexFOM=; b=h/uYOrHAcQbAIGq1p1U0c++7UF6286gt0PWCrowhbyLcpL+9ZIQTMAmN7nj0VRmvUW gvcnBVAvqxH+1X5xwuvciNd35uikQ4RUQ+mFlS90B0x8kI3/N4X/0Pw0ofYpEivo9ipr RgIg9GsJuiqm53r0auWnOsd1uSm3xBCQEeYy4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F19jHcXF5Iy9h6mC/WvDjkiinQZ68kcLOQJnhFQG6dxitLGH8Y4BHPFp0J6F0Xm21R PsBl7pFRZJBrkYr8ww+GKRiVsMU2gHvFWQhKRmHRZRDraJbFF+dp3V+eRyS/egxECUP0 qWUU05Ft0xqGm3sMAAE1FGC93LOcjdVj+LBCM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.11.7 with SMTP id o7mr2252351mui.95.1241781231063; Fri, 08 May 2009 04:13:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A030BA1.8070709@samsco.org> References: <270637.78561.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <32413E83-2059-4A47-AB45-EA7A1A509DD6@gid.co.uk> <4A030ADB.9050802@keltia.freenix.fr> <4A030BA1.8070709@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:13:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: pluknet To: Scott Long Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ollivier Robert , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hypertherading X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 11:13:52 -0000 2009/5/7 Scott Long : > Ollivier Robert wrote: >> >> On 7/05/2009 10:17, Bob Bishop wrote: >>> >>> AFAICS the reference doesn't support that conclusion at all. >> >> Nehalem CPUs'HT feature is significantly different from the one present = in >> previous P4 CPUs. =A0Apparently, Nehalem's HT works. =A0Memory bandwidth= being >> much higher helps too. >> > > I keep here the anecdote that "it's better". =A0Is there a good reference > somewhere that describes exactly how it works? > > Scott Hi. There is a number of synthetic, low-level, and h/level application nehalem tests flowing around in Russian. Also, not far ago (31.12.2008 18:09) Intel has published the Intel Optimization Reference Manual for x32/64. (see ch. 8). It might be useful. http://download.intel.com/design/processor/manuals/248966.pdf. --=20 wbr, pluknet