From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Aug 14 14:11:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938503C07C5 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BSljY0x9yz3VgM for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1DEB03C07C4; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA493C0B08 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BSljX1gTkz3W6L for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07EEB21h066538 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:11:04 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: bengt.ahlgren@ri.se Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadv@dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 07EEB3e4018345 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 21:11:03 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: 11.4 sendmail with SASL and ports openssl? To: Bengt Ahlgren References: Cc: stable@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 21:10:57 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BSljX1gTkz3W6L X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.55 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.88)[-0.883]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.41)[0.405]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.973]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:11:29 -0000 14.08.2020 17:46, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > Then the question is whether I need openssl libraries from ports, when I > use that for all ports with DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl due to QT5 > requirements? > > If I want to link with openssl from ports, it looks like I anyway need > SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib, otherwise the linker will pick up > libssl and libcrypto from base. Specifying the full path for these > libraries, like for libsasl2 in the handbook, only results in > double-linking with libraries from both ports and base. So I ended up > with: > > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL > SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib > SENDMAIL_LDADD=/usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so Stock sendmail was recently updated from 8.14.x to 8.16.x in base after 11.4-RELEASE. Previous sendmail version was incompatible with openssl 1.1+, so Handbook updated before 11.4-RELEASE to make sure sendmail is built and linked with stock openssl, or else build failed. It seems updated sendmail in stable branches made compatible with openssl 1.1+, so the choice is yours.