From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 9 19:08:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D561065672 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E288FC12 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0780D46B4C; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:08:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 47D508A01B; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:08:58 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Rainer Goellner Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:08:50 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200909061837.n86IbqMI071582@freefall.freebsd.org> <200909081312.16421.jhb@freebsd.org> <4AA7F323.1060304@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4AA7F323.1060304@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909091508.50274.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:08:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/138571: [lor] LOR on 8.0-BETA3-AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:08:59 -0000 On Wednesday 09 September 2009 2:25:39 pm Rainer Goellner wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Sunday 06 September 2009 2:37:52 pm linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > >> New Synopsis: [lor] LOR on 8.0-BETA3-AMD64 > >> > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138571 > > > > The bufwait/dirhash one is a known false-positive. > > > Nice to read. Hopefully the other one, starting with > ufs/bufwait/ufs, is as harmless... > > BTW, Norbert Koch sent something quite similar on > freebsd-current. I think the ufs/bufwait/ufs one might be harmless as well. That is, it should be ok assuming that softupdates doesn't result in deadlocks by creating cycles of the files it touches. -- John Baldwin