From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 15:39:37 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA13207 for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA13202 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA08245; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 16:39:26 -0700 Message-Id: <199602122339.QAA08245@rover.village.org> To: Terry Lambert Subject: Re: Anybody using netns? Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 12 Feb 1996 16:29:34 MST Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 16:39:25 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk : I completely agree. There should be an area, like "experimental" : called "legacy" or "unsupported". The usual course of events for FreeBSD has been accretion. The slow building up of the core. However, now has come a time when parts of the release need to be spun off into their own area. A good, general strategy is needed to support that, otherwise these kinds of debates will continue to crop of from time to time. Just a thought. Purhaps a good strategy here can go a long way towards keeping a little more harmony in the group without unduely burdoning progress. Anyway, just my two cents... Have fun, and thank you for your continued support of FreeBSD... Warner