From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Nov 13 22:11:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA19187 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 22:11:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from detlev.UUCP (105.camalott.com [208.203.140.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA19182 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 22:11:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA03081; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 00:10:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from joelh) To: Robert Nordier Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD on i386 memory model References: <199811140220.EAA15033@ceia.nordier.com> From: Joel Ray Holveck Date: 14 Nov 1998 00:10:21 -0600 In-Reply-To: Robert Nordier's message of "Sat, 14 Nov 1998 04:20:18 +0200 (SAT)" Message-ID: <86ogqaerea.fsf@detlev.UUCP> Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The transformations between Intel and AT&T syntax can really be > expressed in about a dozen rules, and there are sed and awk scripts > around that do a fairly reasonable job of automatic translation. I posted an article on this here a while back if someone cares to check the archives. (It's the only discussion on assembler I recall being involved in on -hackers.) There's also a decent overview of the differences between AT&T and Intel syntax in the gas info file. Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message