From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 18 02:40:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C174216A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:40:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649C443D39 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:40:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0I2eXtQ078953; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:40:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by realtime.exit.com (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0I2eXlf062226; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:40:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@realtime.exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by realtime.exit.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0I2eVEL062225; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:40:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank) From: Frank Mayhar Message-Id: <200501180240.j0I2eVEL062225@realtime.exit.com> In-Reply-To: <41EC74EA.20703@telus.net> To: Peter Kieser Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:40:31 -0800 (PST) X-Copyright0: Copyright 2004 Frank Mayhar. All Rights Reserved. X-Copyright1: Permission granted for electronic reproduction as Usenet News or email only. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL119 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@exit.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:40:36 -0000 Peter Kieser wrote: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > I have no problem with bringing up the discussion of process > checkpointing on FreeBSD, what I _DO_ have a problem with is all this > cruft about DF on the list all the time. We keep getting the, "DragonFly > does it this way" or "DragonFly has this and we don't" on the > freebsd-hackers mailing list, and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one > annoyed about it. > > Again, I have no problem with bringing up the process checkpointing, I > have a problem with people saying "DragonFly has this" _all_ the time; > if I wanted to hear about DF's development path I would be subscribed to > their mailing lists. I, on the other hand, think the shed should be painted pink. (And that discussion of DF on -hackers is at least as welcome as discussion of discussion of DF on -hackers.) -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/