From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 15 2: 3:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay1.inwind.it (relay1.inwind.it [212.141.53.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF76537BC11 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 02:03:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bartequi@inwind.it) Received: from bartequi.ottodomain.org (212.141.79.75) by relay1.inwind.it; 15 Jul 2000 11:03:23 +0200 From: Salvo Bartolotta Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 10:04:22 GMT Message-ID: <20000715.10042200@bartequi.ottodomain.org> Subject: Re: kernel-building praxis SOLVED To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20000715.1031000@bartequi.ottodomain.org> References: <20000715.1031000@bartequi.ottodomain.org> X-Mailer: SuperCalifragilis X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > My understanding was that the build/installkernel procedure served the= > purpose of making **major** transitions possible, whether or not a > major RELEASE upgrade was involved; whereas the well-known "classical"= > procedure could be used in all other cases/situations. In particular, > the "classical" procedure could be employed after ordinary source > upgrades. > >From now on, am I supposed to be systematically using "make > build/installkernel each and every time I cvsup my sources ? What > [have I missed/] am I missing ? Infinite apologies to the -STABLE Community. I should not have asked [such] a question at 2:03 AM **sigh** Best regards, Salvo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message