From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Mar 14 13:05:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21F2D0B353; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF835F5C; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 234B4270; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:05:53 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Tijl Coosemans , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: svn commit: r436025 - in head/lang: . OpenCoarrays OpenCoarrays/files Message-ID: <20170314130553.GA61536@FreeBSD.org> References: <201703122025.v2CKPT3j040756@repo.freebsd.org> <20170312210236.GA75488@FreeBSD.org> <20170312225202.76a6f57b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <00a0ce93-cfc3-c93d-d0df-09a800258698@FreeBSD.org> <20170314131123.7e074dd8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170314122514.GA39417@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:05:54 -0000 On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:42:42PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 14/03/2017 ?? 13:25, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit : > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:11:30PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:54:57 +0100 Mathieu Arnold > >> wrote: > >>> This was uncalled for. > >>> > >>> The *only* reason we use to lowercase the name of a port when upstream > >>> is not lowercased is if it provides a lowercased binary to run. > > No, we always prefer lowercase, with a few known exceptions. Every sane > > packaging ecosystem does the same (GNU/Linux distributions, Homebrew, you > > name it). > > Well, no. *You* prefer lowercase, but *we*, as a project, do not. But > you have been badgering people long enough that everyone thinks it is a > rule. We're Unix, so yes we do. It is part of our cultural identity and can be seen in command and user names, APIs, header files, just about everywhere. It naturally applies to package and ports' names, and vast majority of existing and new ports arrive lowercased -- and not because I'm "badgering" ports' creators and maintainers, but because they also want it that way. I'm simply trying to keep it all consistent, hense I ask people to rename mixed-case ports. ./danfe