From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Dec 17  3:18:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C17F637B41D; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 03:18:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from kris@localhost)
	by citusc17.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) id fBHBHuF94349;
	Mon, 17 Dec 2001 03:17:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 03:17:55 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Alson van der Meulen <alm@flutnet.org>
Subject: Re: sha1 program
Message-ID: <20011217031755.C94298@citusc17.usc.edu>
References: <20011215091852.A91288@citusc17.usc.edu> <XFMail.20011216135744.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011216135744.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>; from doconnor@gsoft.com.au on Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 01:57:44PM +1030
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 01:57:44PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>=20
> On 15-Dec-2001 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >  Or just ln -sf /usr/bin/openssl /usr/bin/sha1
> > =20
> >  OpenSSL already checks the name it's invoked under and behaves
> >  accordingly.
>=20
> Does it grok the options for md5? :)
> -s would be easy to simulate in a shell script.
> -p would be much more difficult unless openssl supports it.

I have no idea off-hand what flags it supports, but I'd expect it to
not be completely downwards-compatible.  The OpenSSL folks might be
interested in patches though.

Kris

--yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8HdRjWry0BWjoQKURAmSPAJ4wjKj5jT6BL8aWkCthWb2TFAnP7ACg3WvE
AXYB81lbtCGP62h515qfBEA=
=KfI0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message