Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:50:04 -0700 From: David Kirchner <dpk@dpk.net> To: darren david <darren@3x3x3.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck woes: no '-b' option? Message-ID: <35c231bf0510182350m61574d87je3f2e2fc8c7b6e3a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4355E688.8050401@3x3x3.org> References: <4355E688.8050401@3x3x3.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/18/05, darren david <darren@3x3x3.org> wrote: > SEARCH FOR ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK FAILED. YOU MUST USE THE > -b OPTION TO FSCK TO SPECIFY THE LOCATION OF AN ALTERNATE > SUPER-BLOCK TO SUPPLY NEEDED INFORMATION; SEE fsck(8). > > > ---- > > this is all well and good, but according to 'man 8 fsck', there is no > '-b' option. any thoughts on way around this? I'm running on 5.4-STABLE. It looks like the fsck man page needs to be clarified, and the fsck output needs to be modified. What is actually telling you to use -b is "fsck_ffs".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35c231bf0510182350m61574d87je3f2e2fc8c7b6e3a>