From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 21 14:40:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E86E514D14 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:40:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oppermann@pipeline.ch) Received: (qmail 2946 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2000 22:38:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pipeline.ch) ([195.134.128.41]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Jan 2000 22:38:04 -0000 Message-ID: <3888E01C.1E568130@pipeline.ch> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 23:39:24 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesper Skriver Cc: Garance A Drosihn , John Polstra , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please help spread the CVSup mirror load more evenly References: <3888D870.2416BFE8@pipeline.ch> <20000121231050.A14324@skriver.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jesper Skriver wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:06:40PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > I don't see any appearant reson (short of network connectivity) that > > one *needs* to get always the *same* server. > > This has been discussed regulary ... Must have been some time ago... > You will risk hitting 2 different server in 2 rapid cvsup run's, where > the first may be more up to date than the next, as Jordan wrote earlier > in this thread ... Does it matter? Who cvsup's regulary more than once or twice a day? Committers AFAIK do cvs directly. -- Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message