From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat May 7 07:34:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842B5B31CDA; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F46C1203; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFCC127E; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 07:34:32 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Ben Woods Cc: "freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Current , Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase Message-ID: <20160507073432.GB47527@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event X-PEKBAC-Definition: Problem Exists, Keyboard Between Admin/Computer User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 07:34:33 -0000 --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:27:54AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote: > On Saturday, 7 May 2016, Glen Barber wrote: >=20 > > With 'installkernel', the first kernel listed in KERNCONF is installed > > as the default (/boot/kernel), and subsequent kernels are installed with > > the kernel name included in the path (/boot/kernel.${INSTKERNNAME}). In > > both cases (source-based upgrades and with pkgbase), the behavior will > > remain the same. > > >=20 > With the recent commit mentioned previously, only the first kernel listed > in KERNCONF is installed unless make.conf contains the following line: > NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=3Dno >=20 > This affects both source-based upgrades (make installkernel) and package > building (make packages). >=20 > Is this the desired behaviour? >=20 As far as I am aware, yes. I've CC'd glebius@ to confirm. In both cases, the "behavior" should be the same, regardless. I think I'm looking at the question from a different way than you are asking though. Glen --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXLZqIAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KT0KAP/1HqRVB+r5k971oKUO2ktc0m YdITfP6slVa7stmL2795k0ZB60sTZqdO143/yVrmDXB1xN/g/o0IYwn67S34sFBy T9EeAgtFTk0aAoX4ZdEnuFnUSEzenwk7RVZuK9zuHgXahohHXFGLMB09iw4jO0HW XED2n/7f8/ksCOgVPPfQdD5tJyV8pn72YHuEGpKgAUb1D9P45/qxwPkLjhjKbuQO dIWZKgevSZ7eWaZXor9RGe14B/M/BPFE6FzQJE3DIfFYnU2lhtQOhN43lzZFBsKA tIwxnNOLPY9DIb89V9rSn3K8nxd5ojlWgDykaK4dUV+qHpZTNr9g+i2bHAdInhTT d1E0YXR/alLLw2OGJlxKdyrft7y6eN6BL/iHaX4uzNgC+HKY3fAOrIYzjexMQbbf fo3s6nvK6ohwbhiSP0anIk/wfnN+J8ieOtwmfllHxKxHwFEEtm160a8K78H04iYC AYH6EZn5VbF6qRPt4YMoWL69T6PV5mcahA4R2LK9a98RY4Xe1h8eemDPpzR9Mkvz khEbYEmcGTOdJb10NCWUejyRnqhmo52CkpKhOxFAD1VJCrVm2rqMWmQrYBJU5JA4 Uo7awVXccWEK3U1hqn+xTutTx6G9yEZRHMLaClZvoaZpLMMQgMkI7/oH2pRL0OX5 xXipfJVk2UC5boPLO5US =VVcM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd--