From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sun May 6 10:27:49 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BAAFB591A; Sun, 6 May 2018 10:27:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF016F5F1; Sun, 6 May 2018 10:27:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 47E1E1DFAD; Sun, 6 May 2018 10:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 10:27:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r469188 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg_replace Message-ID: <20180506102749.GA58637@FreeBSD.org> References: <201805061015.w46AF3HQ070595@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201805061015.w46AF3HQ070595@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 10:27:49 -0000 On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 10:15:03AM +0000, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > New Revision: 469188 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/469188 > > Log: > ports-mgmt/pkg_replace: Update to 20180424 > > - Cleanup code > - Speed up and strictly check package's dependencies > - While here, pet portlint by using pkg-plist instead of PLIST_FILES Could you explain what did you achieve by moving three-line PLIST_FILES into pkg-plist? How can "pet portlint" be a reason for a change while we generally encourage converting <6-line pkg-plist's into PLIST_FILES? ./danfe > - > -PLIST_FILES= sbin/pkg_replace \ > - man/man1/pkg_replace.1.gz \ > - "@sample %%ETCDIR%%/pkg_replace.conf.sample" Correct PLIST_FILES should read: PLIST_FILES= sbin/pkg_replace \ man/man1/pkg_replace.1.gz \ @sample\ etc/pkg_replace/pkg_replace.conf.sample ./danfe