From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Thu Jul 19 12:09:55 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727971031A68; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Michael.Tuexen@macmic.franken.de) Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10E5D8DC66; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:09:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Michael.Tuexen@macmic.franken.de) Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:6041:44ed:1857:b362] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:6041:44ed:1857:b362]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82BC4721E280D; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:09:50 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r336465 - in head/sys/netinet: . tcp_stacks From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:09:48 -0400 Cc: Randall Stewart , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7FC7DAA2-9B03-4D89-A878-7706EDE4294A@macmic.franken.de> References: <201807182249.w6IMns6D076446@repo.freebsd.org> To: Maxim Konovalov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:09:55 -0000 > On 19. Jul 2018, at 03:12, Maxim Konovalov = wrote: >=20 > Hi Randall, >=20 > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 22:49-0000, Randall Stewart wrote: >=20 >> Author: rrs >> Date: Wed Jul 18 22:49:53 2018 >> New Revision: 336465 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336465 >>=20 >> Log: >> Bump the ICMP echo limits to match the RFC >>=20 > [...] >=20 > Just wonder, are there any practical reasons to do that? In case you send encapsulated packets triggering an ICMP message you actually need more than the 8 bytes which are currently reflected. The number 8 comes from RFC 792, which was published 1981. The new number comes from RFC 1812, which was published 1995. >=20 > While I don't see any meaningful vectors right now this could > potentially make amplification DoS easier, no? I don't think so. When sending packets smaller than 576 - 20 - 8, you get a byte amplification of 8 bytes. Please note that IPv6 already reflects as much as fits in a single packet. So this is not something completely new... Best regards Michael >=20 > --=20 > Maxim Konovalov >=20