From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 20:09:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE8814AD827 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D606D34E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0MK9r7h046022 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:09:54 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: The status of docker To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org References: <089e330d-2761-2440-3b7f-dd22e9088af5@gjunka.com> <9A01020A-7CC6-4893-A425-11A7BF736F4E@ultra-secure.de> <42f59b63-fdc7-306f-d836-83533741a86c@FreeBSD.org> <5c926314-adce-dba1-f5ce-2fda35e1aeba@gjunka.com> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <1548c51e-49ba-4113-5ade-5515b77a3a44@gjunka.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:09:53 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB-large X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A8D606D34E X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list1@gjunka.com designates 88.98.225.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list1@gjunka.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.98.225.149]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gjunka.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: gjunka.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.952,0]; IP_SCORE(-3.64)[ip: (-9.53), ipnet: 88.98.192.0/18(-4.77), asn: 56478(-3.81), country: GB(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56478, ipnet:88.98.192.0/18, country:GB]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:09:56 -0000 On 22/01/2019 20:01, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi all, > >> Am 22.01.2019 um 20:48 schrieb Grzegorz Junka > >: >> 2. A docker container in a jail with no native linux kernel, docker >> is running completely in FreeBSD environment >> >> 2 would be most convenient but also most difficult as all smallest >> docker features would need to be ported natively to FreeBSD > > IIRC the Joyent approach was to port the Linux system call API to an > extent that made it possible to „simply“ run Linux Docker in zones without > a Linux kernel … > So option 2? That's nice, good to know. Maybe it isn't as difficult. Docker is quite popular in the industry so maybe some sponsorship would be possible? BTW is Joyent is any way related to Oracle? Why would they want to support zones? Is the support they implemented open sourced? GrzegorzJ