From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Apr 6 17:51:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E6637BFC1 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 17:51:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) id 12dMzm-000Fce-00; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 01:51:34 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA33396; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 01:51:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 01:51:33 +0100 From: J McKitrick To: Kenny Drobnack Cc: Walter Brameld , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-4.0 and Parallel Port Zip 100 Drive (fwd) Message-ID: <20000407015133.A33356@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20000406220159.A31754@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from kdrobnac@mission.mvnc.edu on Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 06:56:38PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 06:56:38PM -0400, Kenny Drobnack wrote: > I don't know if this is relevant, but does it actually make a difference > if its on a laptop or desktop? I figured a parallel port is a parallel > port. Or do they have a slightly different configuration? Apparently, they are different enough. Not sure why, but it matters. Maybe has to do with PCMCIA, or something like that. And there is no config that fixes it rightnow, it is broken. jm -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org To Microsoft: "Your tyranny I was part of, is now cracking on every side. Now your own life is in danger. Your Empire is on fire." Front 242 ------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message