From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Aug  6 06:32:47 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id GAA15674
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 06:32:47 -0700
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA15668
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 06:32:44 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id CAA01954
	  ; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 02:03:23 +0100
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: version of amd in FreeBSD 2.0.5 R and -current is old 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 05 Aug 1995 17:22:24 PDT."
             <199508060022.RAA03315@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> 
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 1995 02:03:19 +0100
Message-ID: <1952.807670999@palmer.demon.co.uk>
From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199508060022.RAA03315@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" write
s:
>He will be taking on the roll of full time sendmail maintenance for
>FreeBSD, as he deals with sendmail day in and day out.  He has already
>done 2 test imports of sendmail 8.6.12 on his repository and as soon as
>we work out a few more kinks he will be doing it live on freefall.

>Consider sendmail handled, and this should happen Sunday or Monday on
>Freefall. [...]

Ok - so sendmail is covered, now who wants to take `amd' on? At least
I understood sendmail enough to handle it, amd is still a dark area
for me...

What other bits of the tree need overseeing? src/gnu/* obviously,
ncftp seems to be handled by ache. Anything else? named? (another one
I can do if no-one else wants to)

Gary