Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 21:12:40 +0200 (EET) From: Penisoara Adrian <ady@warp.starnets.ro> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Latest 3.0-SNAP for ISP Production server ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971117210625.7664C-100000@ady.warp.starnets.ro> In-Reply-To: <19971117075259.32948@klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 1997 at 01:32:06AM +0200, Penisoara Adrian wrote: > > [...] > > We have an dual Pentium machine running 3.0-970718-SNAP and we have big > > plans for it (it's our main server) so I'd like to 'upgrade' it to the > > newest stable SNAP in this time frame, while we're going to do a bunch of > > changes in the networking infrastructure. > > Beeing our main server I'd like to know what's the latest _stable_ SNAP; > > I'm specially looking for stable AIC7XXX (AHA2940AU adapter), MFS, PPP and > > networking subsystems. > > You should use 2.2-STABLE for a production machine. -current is > developers playground. It's not recommended to run -current in a > production environment. For SMP you should wait, until 3.0-RELEASE > comes out. Ok, SMP does pretty well here at home, but if I were you > I'd choose -STABLE for the company (as I did twice). Yes, I agree with you, but I have to go for SMP - this dual Pentium machine is our main server... BTW, I did enjoy 3.0-current, except for those nasty AIC7XXX bugs in a while (did -current really get rid of 'em ?). > > -- > Andreas Klemm > powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD'' > Thanks. Ady (@warp.starnets.ro)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971117210625.7664C-100000>