Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:05:59 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/faac/files patch-gcc Message-ID: <20041030140559.GB83224@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20041030211415.3330b88b.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <200410300322.i9U3MNsA017587@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041030211415.3330b88b.nork@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (10.30.2004 @ 0814 PST): Norikatsu Shigemura said, in 0.6K: << > On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 03:22:23 +0000 (UTC) > Michael Johnson <ahze@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > ahze 2004-10-30 03:22:23 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > > audio/faac/files patch-gcc > > Log: > > Add missing header to fix build of gstreamer-plugins on >5.x > > Thank you. But, please bump PORTREVISION in this case(for > effect to other ports, such as a significant change). >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/faac/files patch-gcc" from Norikatsu Shigemura << Why? If gst-p wouldn't build before on >5.X, why force 4.X users to rebuild faac to fix a problem they didn't have? It was on my suggestion that he didn't bump PORTREVISION, btw. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041030140559.GB83224>