From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 19 16:11:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA07417 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 16:11:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA07383 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 16:10:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA00508; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:33:25 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199801200003.KAA00508@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: John Polstra cc: toshok@netscape.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: user limits, login.conf, etc. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 1998 12:25:38 -0800." <199801192025.MAA24381@austin.polstra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:33:25 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > In article <34C16A7A.9E950A3@netscape.com>, > Chris Toshok wrote: > > > Here's my login.conf entry: > > Not to insult your intelligence or anything, but did you run > "cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf" after you edited it? It's easy to > forget that step. Is this step *absolutely* necessary? If so, it needs to be mentioned in the manpage. 8) -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\