From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 11 09:34:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9CA106566C for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234F58FC13 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id o5B9YYLZ074997 ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:34:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627858A073; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:34:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 512FA2C; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:34:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:34:33 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, cracauer@cons.org Message-ID: <20100611093433.GA63854@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4C12032A.004 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4C12032A.004/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Cc: Subject: Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:34:37 -0000 Martin Cracauer wrote: > Right now I think there's a general lack of people building CMUCL > binaries, BTW. There are "recent" cmucl binaries built here: http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2009/01/ for freebsd 7 and freebsd 8. I think this is for x86, not x86-64 but they should work, it is not clear for me if cmucl makes use of 64 bits anyways (maxima doesn't). Unfortunately there are not more recent snapshots for freebsd 8 and no freebsd snapshots at all since 2010. In january 2010 there is the comment: " The FreeBSD binaries I had uploaded for the snapshot were flawed: I just discovered that I accidentally built them without Unicode support. To avoid confusion, these binaries have been removed. -- Alex Goncharov, 2010-03-30 " Being a maxima user i am very attached to cmucl which works very well with maxima (faster than sbcl), and i have in the past compiled cmucl using older cmucl versions, which works quite easily. Here i am afraid that Alex Goncharov has encountered some problem, and also that Darwin, Linux and NetBSD support were considered more important ... -- Michel TALON