From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 20 09:37:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 98622106568C; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:37:17 +0000 From: Craig Rodrigues To: David Wolfskill , current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090220093717.GA90962@crodrigues.org> References: <20090218213119.GU81076@albert.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090218213119.GU81076@albert.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: High CPU usage for hald(8) as of r188749 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:37:18 -0000 On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:31:19PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > On my laptop, after building CURRENT (r188749) this morning, it seems > that hald(8) is using a bit more CPU than its proper share: Go back and read the freebsd-current archives for the past few weeks. There are some problematic interactions between the new USB2 code and hal that are being worked on right now. -- Craig Rodrigues rodrigc@crodrigues.org