From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Oct 23 01:43:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA06270
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 01:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (root@tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp [133.246.32.58])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA06242;
          Wed, 23 Oct 1996 01:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (masafumi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (8.7.6/3.4W4-SMTP) with ESMTP id RAA06606; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 17:43:02 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199610230843.RAA06606@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, scrappy@freebsd.org
Cc: max@wide.ad.jp
Subject: Re: ports/1770
From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.06 on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 17:43:02 +0900
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

    >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->asami Satoshi is in
    >> charge of ports...

    asami> No, please don't this!  We just added "freebsd-ports" to
    asami> the list of acceptable responsible parties just so we can
    asami> avoid this!

    asami> I'm not solely responsible for importing ports, actually if

Yeah, I thought FreeBSD-ports was added so that committers can take
over the work whatever he/she feels they can handle.  Besides, putting
freebsd-ports in the responsible: filed makes it clear that no one has
been working on the PR.  (Now it looks like Satoshi decided to start
closing all the ports related PR himself and other committers like
myself have nothing to do with them. :-)  Thanks Satoshi.... :-) :-) )

Seriously, I usually look for PR without responsible person by looking
at the web page and don't touch the PR with names.

Masafumi