From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Apr 26 20: 4:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from lightship.internal.homeport.org (breakwater.homeport.org [216.67.13.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D395237BE33 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:04:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shevett@stonekeep.com) Received: from localhost (shevett@localhost) by lightship.internal.homeport.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA00298; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 03:05:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from shevett@stonekeep.com) X-Authentication-Warning: lightship.internal.homeport.org: shevett owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 03:05:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Dave Belfer-Shevett X-Sender: shevett@localhost To: jflowers@ezo.net Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems configuring Vadem VG-469 PCMCIA controller. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org jflowers@ezo.net wrote: > I just went through this with a Lucent Wavelan that uses a Vadem > controller. What I found was that the Lucent ISA card was strapped for > 0x3e2. Changing the kernel config to 0x3e2 allowed the ISA card to be > initialized but the PCCard did not initialize (no slots). All started > working when I set legacy ISA for irq10 and 11 in the BIOS, set the > kernel config to 0x3e2 and irq11 and hard-coded irq10 in the pccard.conf > file. The Vadem controller I have is not the one that's physically attached to the Wavelan cards as they come from Lucent. This Vadem controller is from Actiontec - a PC700. (http://www.actiontec.com/support/readers/pc700.html#tech). Remember that 'pnpinfo' comes up with: Logical Device ID: AEI0218 0x1802a904 #0 Vendor register funcs 00 I/O Range 0x3e0 .. 0x3fe, alignment 0x2, len 0x2 [16-bit addr] So the board is definately at 0x3e0... What's puzzling me is that the kernel -definately- knows there's a device there: unknown0: at port 0x3e0-0x3e1 on isa0 Is it that that signature 'ACTIONTEC...' isn't matching a configuration the kernel identifies as a Vadem cnotroller? How can I say "No! Really! That's a Vadem 469! I swear!" Desperate... :) dave. -------------------. Web-based problem management: www.stonekeep.com Dave Belfer-Shevett >----------------------------------------------------. shevett@pobox.com / [He] crafts his debate with the professionally honed \ ------------------< edge of a plastic snack spork." | \______________________________________________________/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message