From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 16:24:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09284876 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 16:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nijmegen.renzel.net (mx1.renzel.net [195.243.213.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE83D22FC for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 16:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dublin.vkf.isb.de.renzel.net (unknown [10.0.0.80]) by nijmegen.renzel.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id 7667A14148EA for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 18:24:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asbach.renzel.net (unknown [10.2.0.7]) by dublin.vkf.isb.de.renzel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F97C1A0763 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 18:24:23 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" From: Nils Beyer Organization: VKF Renzel GmbH Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 18:24:23 +0200 User-Agent: KNode/4.12.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Subject: Re: bhyve on AMD, linux and high load To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org References: <537E16FE.4070309@digiware.nl> Lines: 18 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at nijmegen.renzel.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00,MISSING_MID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on nijmegen.renzel.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 16:24:41 -0000 Hi Willem, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > [...] > With the new kernel, that is no longer the case. On a idle vm the CPU > load is like 6-7%.... > > At the moment I'm running: > linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic_3.13.0-24.46_amd64 Now, that looks promising. Is that with or without your own bhyve-/SVM-patches? If that's with your own patches, have you already integrated Anish's patches in them? Regards, Nils