From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Oct 28 19:28:41 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA18696
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 19:28:41 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA18689
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 19:28:34 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA00410; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 19:28:01 -0700
Message-Id: <199510290228.TAA00410@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: rcarter@geli.com (Russell L. Carter), jkh@time.cdrom.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Arcanity in services on servers 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 28 Oct 1995 17:04:52 PDT."
             <199510290004.RAA03284@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 19:28:00 -0700
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> Terry Lambert said:
 > > > This discussion is probably getting too arcane for the general
 > > > list readership; we should probably move it to private email.
 > > 
 > > Now, isn't this the sort of thing that should be on hackers?  Where
 > > else can we get multiplatform design discussions that we can use to
 > > help figure out where we (and FreeBSD:) should go next?  It gets
 > > arcane when the discussion gets down to details, which of course is
 > > where the truth is...
 > 
 > With respect, if it belongs in a public forum, it's one of the
 > comp.protocols groups.

Well, you see we can come up with a beatiful architecture however
I am sure that at some we will need OS support.

Nah, it belongs right here or maybe on the multimedia list unfortunatly
if I move the discussion to the multimedia mailing list the discussion
would move right back in here. Gee I wonder why? 

Folks, we already have good networking, fast disk access, video capture
but wait no video servers, no sound servers, no app servers...

I don't think that discussions of implementing video servers, etc.. are
arcane rather forward thinking well at least to some for me it should
have been a reality now.

*It sure would be nice for FreeBSD to take the lead and in upcoming
necessary technology*

	Amancio