From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 10:05:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688AD1065673 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:05:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB5A8FC12 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so4413016ghr.13 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 03:05:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SozEXD0jQ6stcjUU4aejPT9o0GnQcbPN5YaHHqYIycA=; b=nkJmVpru8hPmmQHqqL78edEHV6gRsIU1q6iNweArbQ/swK3TFv6q8vPmQEdHhwBmr2 jQyhEf3Bq8qOz/h+Gxb4KWdZNl9eCnu1V34XsFVlOYzf4igfgfiBOFfHQ1zmw4IpVP/4 Dd7mHF7lvkzltRMf2t12DTFfVTLlG/TkZoNprR2zROG8VBFgCUJUuN+NPHa1BvSbSLVS f2WVm7jOHLiAiwxjIckbEYCo4kwE5HjVMI4Dphu/r/mIynwvX0/SZ/6qzKcdBMsYUjU9 UXTkK2eH/Gz+ISEIccKBG0mXFD1m3BmykN/j/U84aAqz6PL9L6wqjTKowA1BCBWJV1+k awpg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.212.228 with SMTP id nn4mr37985535pbc.68.1332756317284; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 03:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.33.5 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 03:05:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4f6f67a7.4a0c440a.3941.ffffc865@mx.google.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 03:05:17 -0700 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Lytochkin Boris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [ath][CURRENT] Triangle-shaped network performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:05:18 -0000 On 25 March 2012 23:03, Lytochkin Boris wrote: >> 10 beacons a second is fine. 100 beacons a second ? > bintval = 1000 is 1 beacon per second. Actually I was sure that Cisco > AP have this setting at 3k. Hm. Weird. 1 a second seems a bit infrequent. I'm not sure what/why this is a problem. I haven't really thought about it.. :) >> That almost feels like some weird interrupt handling issue. > Any ideas how to proove this theory? Not immediately, no. I'd start by enabling interrupt debugging and see how often RX/TX completion interrupts are coming in. Adrian