Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 03:05:17 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Lytochkin Boris <lytboris@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [ath][CURRENT] Triangle-shaped network performance Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonAUuawBYAcfQA2w7P43fJT7n0Yggdr-cs6yrvymt4isA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAEJYa-QhFYqO6Y_7%2BkO-NvugYR7XvGOUZaF86iqq2OqWciS%2BUQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEJYa-QRx3XU6GjcWnJSTEON2QOUe_gA9Oh0Xo9Vk2ksm0pX%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <4f6f67a7.4a0c440a.3941.ffffc865@mx.google.com> <CAEJYa-RPhRng5tDG88yM8Rx1QE-ttkcoanEH=vn-NN-kc9B6oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=JuGc0XA_2-q8FB9SGK4kJcQwC3ry0wm7sRxKe8dHaTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEJYa-TKdEjynQnM8LTXM863vWWw518VXX_DGVEpw6OvMPzgig@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmom-cBgnuAdXCcH5iVkf32kU6O8T_T%2B==uGpNdBsGu3wOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEJYa-SgTmyX_DodPhcd9B2CYjFB5T0j10KpHX7MHD_g24jUAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEJYa-R87JdeYg521toKf=wZR74e_W3pGXJKDsajhy9=E2CqXw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomyKJujpp56_JYnRogj4OONp_kCG18aQ17=W1aeMHg6Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CAEJYa-QhFYqO6Y_7%2BkO-NvugYR7XvGOUZaF86iqq2OqWciS%2BUQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 March 2012 23:03, Lytochkin Boris <lytboris@gmail.com> wrote: >> 10 beacons a second is fine. 100 beacons a second ? > bintval = 1000 is 1 beacon per second. Actually I was sure that Cisco > AP have this setting at 3k. Hm. Weird. 1 a second seems a bit infrequent. I'm not sure what/why this is a problem. I haven't really thought about it.. :) >> That almost feels like some weird interrupt handling issue. > Any ideas how to proove this theory? Not immediately, no. I'd start by enabling interrupt debugging and see how often RX/TX completion interrupts are coming in. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonAUuawBYAcfQA2w7P43fJT7n0Yggdr-cs6yrvymt4isA>