From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 19 12:31:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1391065674 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5888FC17 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8JCVZJN017309 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:31:35 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8JCVZe4017301 for svn-ports-head@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:31:35 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 43658 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2012 07:31:32 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.115?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.115) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 19 Sep 2012 07:31:32 -0500 Message-ID: <5059BB1D.60504@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:31:25 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <201209182334.q8INYl5P083094@svn.freebsd.org> <20120919034244.GA29962@FreeBSD.org> <20120919085406.GA10551@micro.madpilot.net> <20120919093456.GA83232@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120919093456.GA83232@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 OpenPGP: id=3C9B0CF9; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Chris Rees , Thomas Abthorpe , Guido Falsi Subject: Re: svn commit: r304474 - head/multimedia/cx88 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:31:36 -0000 On 9/19/2012 4:34 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:54:06AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:42:44AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> - Created-by: tag is wrongly spelled and should be followed with tab I >>> think >> >> Right. Going to fix this, but not completely sure about the tab rule, >> anyway it's the same for me, if a tab is preferred I'll add one. > > I'm also not sure about the separator; it should be clarified. Clearly the example in the announcement is a space. Announcement: # Created by: J.Q. Public # $FreeBSD$ Example: # Created By: J.Q. Public # Created By: J.Q. Public (TAB) > >>> - $ finger jah@freebsd.org >>> [freebsd.org] >>> Trying 69.147.83.40... >>> finger: jah: no such user >>> >>> - This should have been "Jason Harmening " >>> >>> - Even for FreeBSD committers, please use their fully qualified identities >> >> I intended to just rename the Whom: to Created by: and left the >> identity as is. If a full identity is requested I'll ask the >> maintainer if he approves this change(or prefers having just the >> name or wants to remove the Created by: line). > > I think this is bad practice. Nicks are too ambiguous and reserved for > FreeBSD committers by default (this is not an rule, but rather established > historical practice). Using "informal" names also creates bad precedent, > like it's OK to use bogus names like "Anonymous" (when it's not anonymous > submittion, e.g. with email address; we have some of them already -- looks > awful) or "4v1l h4c|<3r". Bad practice or not, if only the creator can have it removed, it only makes sense only the creator can authorize changing their address. Especially to some personal email address of theirs. > >> BTW there are other ports(not many I admit) with nicknames not >> present @freebsd.org so I thought it was allowed practice to use >> nicknames too. What if a contributor expresses preference for >> inserting just a nickname there? > > Personally I think we should require standard full name (with optional > decorations like III, .Sr, etc.) and politely ask why would one want to > conceal it. After all, we require it when granting a commit bit. As a last > resort, there is anonymity option for those who prefer not to reveal their > full name. > Please, let's move on. > ./danfe > -- Regards, Bryan Drewery bdrewery@freenode/EFNet