Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:51:07 GMT
From:      Paolo Pisati <piso@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   PERFORCE change 102270 for review
Message-ID:  <200607241151.k6OBp7Fw068874@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=102270

Change 102270 by piso@piso_newluxor on 2006/07/24 11:50:38

	Updated.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/soc2006/intr_filter/notes#8 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/soc2006/intr_filter/notes#8 (text+ko) ====

@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
   accessing the hw registers. The simplest solution would employ
   a spin lock, but i'm wondering about the performance penalty...
 
++ Retire IH_FAST and INTR_FAST
+[DONE]
+
 + Review all the functions that override bus_generic_setup_intr()
   and are unaware of filter model (tipically they record in a struct
   just the *intr function and not the filter...) 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607241151.k6OBp7Fw068874>