From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jan 13 04:02:46 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA22081
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 04:02:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA22074
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 04:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id DAA08222; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 03:58:20 -0800
To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey)
cc: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert), gjennejohn@frt.dec.com,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Status of ISDN drivers 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Jan 1996 09:22:25 +0100."
             <199601130822.JAA19572@allegro.lemis.de> 
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 03:58:20 -0800
Message-ID: <8220.821534300@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I thought he wanted to bond two 64k channels.  That's what the card

That is correct.

> (for data) and a 16 kB D channel (for signalling).  At the risk of
> repeating myself, many RBOCs can't handle this configuration and chop
> one bit per byte off the B channel to simulate a D channel, leaving
> only 56 kb/s bandwidth for the B channels.  In another mail, I

And at the risk of repeating *myself*, the RBOCs here handle it just
fine - I have the measurements to prove it.. :-)

So the fact remains that if these boards can hack 2x64K, I might be in
the market for a pair.

						Jordan