Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 19:33:15 -0500 From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads discussion Message-ID: <384EF8CB.D83F47EB@vigrid.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912081514280.23315-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > > is not dead.. we're all catching our breath! > > Tomorrow at the Bay Area Freebsd Users Group (BAFUG) > there will be a food fight over threads kernel support. > Anyone within driving range is urged to attend. Hey, this isn't fair! > I'll be there, as will Matt, Terry, and Jason. If I wasn't 2700 miles away, I'd be there too. Please let us know what was discussed. BTW, I don't think the kernel can always know if a subprocess is in a notification upcall by looking at the user stack pointer. The upcall notification may be temporarily switched to resume a preempted thread holding a critical resource. Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?384EF8CB.D83F47EB>