Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:32:28 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@1command.com> To: "Glen Barber" <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: No, the FreeBSD website was not hacked.... (Re: Who hacked the FreeBSD website?) Message-ID: <6effd252686d854b01b13ee0d2e7bc40.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20131008152248.GJ24985@glenbarber.us> References: <eb067d53df1696c6d47151a6bb32c452.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20131008152248.GJ24985@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Please don't use subject lines like that for broken links... Sorry. I was sure that the ports page was rendered as an automated process. Making it unlikely that such a dramatic change in pathing would be highly unlikely, if not impossible. > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:00:14AM -0700, Chris H wrote: >> Greetings, >> I was performing a ports search, and noticed that all the links >> providing more information about each port goes to the FreeBSD >> 404 page. For example, autotrace-0.31.1_23; >> The link to it is: >> http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace >> the "Long description" link is: >> http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace/pkg-descr?revision=HEAD >> > > It looks like the paths are messed up somehow. I'll take a look asap. Aren't changes like this verified before roll out? --Chris > > Glen > >> Both of which return: >> >> Page not found. >> Oh no. :( >> >> Any chance FreeBSD has a backup of the web site? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-www@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-www >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-www-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6effd252686d854b01b13ee0d2e7bc40.authenticated>