From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 09:38:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 505ED1065679; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:38:51 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20101203093851.GA59399@FreeBSD.org> References: <201012030443.oB34hNLo042059@repoman.freebsd.org> <4CF8AB2D.8060201@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CF8AB2D.8060201@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Mikhail Teterin , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gdb66 Makefile ports/devel/gdb66/files itcl33-patch X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:38:51 -0000 On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:32:45AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > OPTIONS= [..] > .include > .if (WITH_FOO) > USE_TK= [..] > .endif > > .include > do-[..] > .include I think in most (simple) cases separate includes for .pre/.port parts is unnecessary, no?: OPTIONS= [...] .include .include ./danfe