From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 2 14:36:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA07053 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA07032 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:36:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id OAA24597 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:23:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA07162; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:23:35 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703022223.OAA07162@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Charles Henrich cc: scrappy@hub.org, ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 17:15:33 EST." <199703022215.RAA00851@crh.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 14:23:35 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Well, okay you convince the folks which are generating the binaries for the latest clients to give us a binary for our PPRO 8) Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of Charles Henrich : > > >From The Desk Of The Hermit Hacker : > > > On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > > > > > > Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and get > > > him > > > > > the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8) > > > > > > > > If you check the stats page, you'll notice he just changed his listing > > > > from 606k keys/sec to 676k keys/sec, so he has the updated binary. The > > > > wonders of mime attachments :-) > > > > > > > > > > Where can one get this updated binary? > > > > > > > > > > ftp://rah.star-gate.com/pub/rc5-56-client.gz > > > > Have at it 8) > > Its interesting to see a factually "ancient" binary being called the updated > one :) > > -Crh > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich