From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jun 22 20:56:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F052EAC5E1E for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA HLL ISSUER 01" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C04F9205A for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E4860915; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:56:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M_u5yO3dTyPS; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:56:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (inet04.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D61E60B64; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:56:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=harte-lyne.ca; s=dkim_hll; t=1466628985; bh=KOeUBuU7wN3Cju7x7YqCUsnlHVkbTr80P999YbVwfSU=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:Reply-To; b=Mstv2MZdH/uyFAWAPXVIqLL29kZx0OnJLtAR3Fn2cbxqqmgapYSHg6PZdErsYg2Zm nhuti2CO4ZbXs/Y/pLxlaSZV8Q1sPLS6WGqieJyvmLl8vxrH0JFolhGxVPpmILkFku VJL1/DJOqSp38GZofrEZp5lNm/tAQW/5lraKm4S19H+0YSM5Jzc4g5+QH5VRU7Spx6 KSGMLnSfO6uTX9/Edw2QAcpoX7p+NZgCdsJYIGHXtP+HG6FBc3h6U05iJJM1fryf2p mnoUZbP3MZSb9j7UtxacEIQMYXZMxuVhcOBnhrbLjvOI0H1+UzmJ/9lB54UUCrnx5L kFzvMa/EBR0CQ== Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:56:25 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:56:25 -0400 Subject: Re: FreeBSD-10.3p5 - Samba43-4.3.8 From: "James B. Byrne" To: "Kevin Seidel" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:56:29 -0000 On Wed, June 22, 2016 16:34, Kevin Seidel wrote: > Hi James, > > this bug was already reported > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208837) and is > fixed > in samba43-4.3.8_1 and samba43-4.3.9. > Thank you very much. But is the domain install that I have just finished damaged or not? If this is just a bunch of warning messages about a deprecated call but things are just fine regardless then I can keep going. If it indicates a serious defect impacting the integrity of the installation then I have to fix it. If I may impose another question: Are either of these available as a package? I have been using pkg exclusively to this point. When I run freebsd-update fetch it reports nothing newer than what I already have so I infer these are not packages. Building a port should prove no hardship but if these are already packaged then I would prefer to use pkg. Sincerely, -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3