From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 12:07:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA5E16A50C; Thu, 6 May 2004 12:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5CC43D49; Thu, 6 May 2004 12:07:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (not verified)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F6C5485D; Thu, 6 May 2004 14:07:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3EACF6FF36; Thu, 6 May 2004 14:07:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 14:07:29 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Oliver Eikemeier , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040506190729.GD1777@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Oliver Eikemeier , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200404160124.i3G1OlUd067575@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040416163635.GB49780@madman.celabo.org> <4080151C.1070200@fillmore-labs.com> <20040416173857.GA50670@madman.celabo.org> <20040416174418.GC50670@madman.celabo.org> <40802354.3030202@fillmore-labs.com> <20040417152242.GA5543@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040417152242.GA5543@madman.celabo.org> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/pkg_install-devel Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 19:07:31 -0000 On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > I *would* like to see the package versioning rules made more clear and > explicit, and perhaps even see some reform. However, making up a new > special case for `pl' seems right out. > > Has much discussion over PR 56961 taken place anywhere? I like it as a > starting point. Is anyone besides Oliver and myself interested in package version number reform? I'd really like to produce a `better' set of rules for the handbook that eliminates some of the edge cases, and then re-version the relatively few ports that don't fit the rules. Oliver's PR is as good a starting point as any that I've seen--- it goes further than our current rules and only conflicts with them in one case. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org