Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:10:04 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports Message-ID: <1179907804.60308.1.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <465398E0.40404@math.missouri.edu> References: <465291FB.4010901@math.missouri.edu> <20070522071941.GB59910@xor.obsecurity.org> <4652FFB4.8060107@math.missouri.edu> <1179846295.52353.27.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4653349D.7080608@math.missouri.edu> <46533D66.1070305@math.missouri.edu> <1179868612.83498.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <1179869940.83498.9.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070522165525.S52261@math.missouri.edu> <1179871899.83498.10.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070522172627.A52261@math.missouri.edu> <465398E0.40404@math.missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-txZz0CuIAzb7Cy7brZxZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stephen Montgomery-Smith p=ED=B9e v =FAt 22. 05. 2007 v 20:29 -0500:
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> > On Wed, 23 May 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >=20
> >> Stephen Montgomery-Smith p?e v ?t 22. 05. 2007 v 16:56 -0500:
> >>
> >>>> I have generated two INDEXes, one with the patch and one without.
> >>> They
> >>>> are identical, the timings:
> >>>>
> >>>> INDEX-orig
> >>>> real 16m32.761s
> >>>> user 18m36.802s
> >>>> sys 8m38.610s
> >>>>
> >>>> INDEX-ddd
> >>>> real 16m34.620s
> >>>> user 17m25.976s
> >>>> sys 8m46.333s
> >>
> >>> Sorry it didn't work out. Thanks for trying it.
> >>
> >> Don't get me wrong - the minute saved here is good enough reason to
> >> apply that patch.
> >>
> >>> Could you try the "shell" one also? I got the impression it was a bi=
t
> >>> faster.
> >>
> >> Can you send me the patch?
> >=20
> > Yes. In the same place as the previous one you put:
> >=20
> > .ifdef _USE_GNOME
> > _USE_GNOME!=3D(for i in ${_USE_GNOME}; do ${ECHO_CMD} $$i; done) | sort=
-u
> > .endif
> >=20
> > I'm going to try it out myself also to see if it is faster.
>=20
> I tried it out. On my rather fast computer, I am getting similar times.=20
> The non-shell patch seems slightly better, but there is not much=20
> between that and the shell patch. Both patches give something like 7%=20
> speed improvements over the original. It only potentially speeds up=20
> gnome ports, and then only a few of them like alacarte, so even if it=20
> dramatically speeds those few up, the average speed up over all ports=20
> will not be so great. Like I said earlier, overall improvement is=20
> noticeable albeit not dramatic.
Thanks for testing. I'll stick with pure-make patch and will see to
commit it after xorg freeze and some more formal testing.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Like 'Do Notte Buye Betamacks.' That was a prediction for 1972.
--=-txZz0CuIAzb7Cy7brZxZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBGU/bYntdYP8FOsoIRAvRoAJ9yLgI3dsM5TPzS6fHSLCytKAugBQCfWZ6n
64vmt99hE73mzYOSYpno0rw=
=2Sc1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-txZz0CuIAzb7Cy7brZxZ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1179907804.60308.1.camel>