From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 11 02:32:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA12510 for current-outgoing; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 02:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA12505 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 02:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id JAA03103; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:31:57 GMT Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 18:31:56 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: Amancio Hasty cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: vxfs (was Re: overclocking) In-Reply-To: <199706101846.LAA07255@rah.star-gate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 10 Jun 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Tnks Terry! > > So does anyone know how much is VXFS for FreeBSD (assuming that is > available) ? > It's not available for *BSD. The reasons cited were ... 1) It's a large porting task, fs/vnode semantics vary quite a bit between Unix implementations. 2) They want a larger market or someone to fund the development. Regards, Mike Hancock