From nobody Fri Dec 22 19:16:08 2023 X-Original-To: desktop@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SxcTh5hwlz54M2D for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SxcTh4VPFz4FyR for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1703272568; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=s9nVe8sj3NqeO1dXIW7IR4DmSSLEn13GEIHLA25+KBdCwbb605AaHPJrfUXrk9GRm9M+ME l3c0V9j8y+BSQTtNdtek/QWRCBmGreAuCi78mGPUJximysO01MMr/CdoTPAxaIBD2nWbni SmhHjE4Y5FQ/sPZfuvQgyA2Bf74Q3nYTTofio/8NxX3vWZh6jEO4rNusgrakg5s6/eqI8z eD3cV6CfTgYaGequST2ZNID95X2VaZ70Ph9rVrpGlE4inDv/YXQUcW1nnirPnCS41KOdNQ Rajrz+rs0rV6g062ubAKZNSbCL1OAJqMfE9K/BsC16UEldE7TXyZ5hMuuZleuw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1703272568; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mi1+Xv8kCZlBMl8oqhd/jjyi4xPvX5q3P9wPU9+ABiI=; b=jyorTto3CTZDPpNojKF2x1ocAGHvDHLA947xpYFrja9LsVDLF8YqrKY4gtjbLbONkWwyCc rgyJ88iEIten8t452/108qoU0sUyiOJZqPFx9kc0MJuBHPF5Zu6ZEiNJugKh+wlWfD4sE7 vniMCgo8QcUVsTU75mDwp0A/b6nZllszYobr7KXoD6aGZ0737+KBVXLBx2ryFgmPnnadPp OIfMGucUG+J/03jMrXK4oLIVugf7Tv+iZCSOCeLLOZQdSV5FaY6CJQOv5hMEGyvWZPmcRO fqjnz1+v5o0dw8XE9FHI8bijKNtL67mUv71d4KOVNXhJycJ3WL3K/AGyVMoSBg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SxcTh3T41zDWH for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3BMJG8ns088281 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:16:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 3BMJG86i088280 for desktop@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:16:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: desktop@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 266532] x11/lightdm: Login sessions do not respect login.conf Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:16:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: madpilot@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: desktop@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Using and improving FreeBSD on the desktop List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-desktop List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D266532 --- Comment #18 from Guido Falsi --- (In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #17) > Is POLA include bugs? ) Well actually it could, but that's not the point here. There is no bug. It looks to me you have a very personal definition of bug = and of how to "solve" them. > Or these 2 scripts may be distributed separately and sample config may us= e it by default. Great idea, why don't you file a bug report for anew port which includes t= hese two scripts and all the glue needed to install them? Maybe someone would pi= ck it up (not me, obviously) > sw cursor + heavy load like llvm/chromium compilation. > This is very simple change to improve user experience without any risk of= side effects. The point is that changing Xorg priority is not a bugfix, but a local workaround that each user can choose to apply locally, and is not something that we should impose from the official ports. Personally I don't consider what you describe as a bug or even an annoyance. But that's me. > This is very simple change to improve user experience without any risk of= side effects. This is your opinion, but is against port rules. Any patch included in the ports tree should also be sent upstream [1] so your proposal of including a patch that is not good enough to be upstreamed is not acceptable by the por= ts rules. Also not upstreaming patches is a big problem with the ports tree. Differen= ces with upstream accumulate and we are handling ports here, not forks. So yes, if upstreeam has a bug, the bug is expected to also exist in the po= rt. It can be fixed in the port before the upstream but in such a way to be upstreamed. Anyway I'm not considering these scripts for inclusion. I would not feel comfortable committing them. But this will not stop you from writing to the mailing lists or seeking other committer's interest in them. [1] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/contributing/#_maintainer_responsibili= ties --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=