Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:42:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Mitya <mitya@cabletv.dp.ua>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replace bcopy() to update ether_addr Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208210942150.33814@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <5452BF37-3658-4C1F-B965-CE3EA28B6EA5@bsdimp.com> References: <50324DB4.6080905@cabletv.dp.ua> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208201844220.35173@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <B2BB7724-57A9-40C9-AE9F-FFEC83D9DE9A@bsdimp.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208202117230.19372@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <5452BF37-3658-4C1F-B965-CE3EA28B6EA5@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Even without this tagging, the code to do a structure level copy of 6 bytes is going to be tiny... true. just to make sure it will be absolutely portable how about bcopymacaddress(dst,src) and then define it whatever you find it fastest on any architecture?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208210942150.33814>