From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 2 21:04:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 228BE5E1; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB5E118B9; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n16so6275971oag.27 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:04:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0JVVKVCLJZVP1UaLCmfpR+y7Ps+GyKHqCeOZ5GRPICI=; b=ARqfL+VyVANVwj8Q4gneVWGMJbOMT+ZOTHjY7+Y6DRSqQm8AtxGVn8AN5sa1bf0+s6 Q9RICryVpkafnSbAOb+tUSCOFSblk5jhKkiONq5vJ9XSNw49qj6ycOMVZ2kgFsaw0cd8 uRRhKb6GjPf6KXr13vyyOZk3FgXJMoiHLmVbK7bWZjPf8uzIsdqXBNAHcQu9cReEqvLk 0yLA2Ii50DAwY/guonNRMDvnuLOVPI864qtgf8XFCsuOsIEm4pGRpRvMEa9ZsZHkazSB f1VEAtJ4/yXjigfOjLQidKcC46+WqqkErpwSeQVotkWuL5qIWzhHorjUl5yHVi2/nx5b fm7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.116.74 with SMTP id ju10mr13150606oeb.6.1393794292232; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.78.71 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:04:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140227021917.GE81440@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <530EBCDB.1090303@delphij.net> <53138FA6.1060705@delphij.net> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 16:04:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UDP Lite support From: Joe Nosay To: Xin LI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 21:04:53 -0000 On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Joe Nosay wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA512 >>> >>> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote: >>> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> > On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote: >>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis >>> >>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been >>> >>>>>>> reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged >>> >>>>>>> packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure >>> >>>>>>> where to put this question. Apologies for the noise. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> You've provided next to no context. What is the >>> >>>>>> question? What thread are you referring to? If this is >>> >>>>>> the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be vastly more >>> >>>>>> appropriate than -current. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> -- Brooks >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>> Thanks. I will ask kevlo and maybe bring it up on >>> >>>>> freebsd-net. It has to do with an implementation of the >>> >>>>> JACK server using UDP Lite for transferring data. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UDP-lite-for-FreeBSD-td4010236.html >>> > >>> > Looks >>> >>>>> >>> > like nobody proposed a patch? >>> > >>> > I think the concern was that this is not very useful in real-world >>> > scenarios due to link layer error detection mechanism but that >>> > doesn't raise a red flag to me assuming this is sufficiently self >>> > contained feature as it would improve compatibility with other >>> > operating systems. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> https://github.com/torelizer/jack_trauma >>> >> >>> >> Not my project; but, I want to port it to FreeBSD. First is to >>> >> get it to build from source. Use your raspberry pi with FreeBSD >>> >> to broadcast your tunes and all. >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks for all of the input. The project is being reworked to >>> > improve the code. >>> >>> Kevin Lo have a patchset but needs someone to do performance testing >>> (its impact on non-UDPLite applications), test with vimage, etc: >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udp-v.diff >>> >>> Are you interested in working on these and report back? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTE4+mAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsthoQAIW67l7yDfIPvxDsNIWWJcRd >>> 8brFYCAOPYE4LpuLGjtSgy370aBe9JmwAm41tE4qF0WhGpcu6TLsKjgMGWa/lHCc >>> JId8+WBfbbQT8XJj/d+3oOETn5/rglvlRhJbnNIwaQpTXxuMC5oz2nGW7rIpIkaA >>> OHo0D20DzGj4nxrQvijZ7DsMkk3F+KJu/4p7M6lpsIPCakknW1WD7IHRfbZ4Oldz >>> 2xH4HfIk7cAdA7i/YUNjlpSgWFQ5OU03J5HAYfC6W37wiGbjdBYf/PKVhJ8hz7+D >>> OCl+yCV00u4fCjlY6zXFea9pGr7Cl1P+sapwKDZ4g+NpNHxBUVY+ahbjQUHYON2W >>> sdzAsLpMMqavCr1o8mcXdm7IPRlLUK9QZUySC9DitPvoF8G2llTAz1mWa4/Oj7/S >>> JMiUERcaL5gdFN8EgEKkamFgLJguYquAjGtiowa51EMbnZG0Q2yWUcrEBFHWBEZT >>> RW1u6r4ChIrPE9X5ljfFpQyKG6jFhYFXG+iVlgTB7F2ZWhjPAXi/tLbBnvIcci1m >>> Md4XFm/bBJj/yNXdPuCi+CtvvdpZ/d4LQn4B7By5bIo1QjCb4Zx5n2Tq5xnYZUOI >>> CnSVnNSkwLbbrAVtYOVWnrSuwR33JQnqeGHdM+XYBBwKBRhrx+ZgFWD7N6Gm95PU >>> xXSxkgYVXI4sgi7Lh3Ia >>> =2Vmc >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >> >> >> I have on patch file that Lo sent. Three different files are on it with >> the assumption that the patch-root is /usr/src. I'm thinking about snipping >> it twice and then applying each subpatch within the proper subdirectory. >> Now, this would not when Index:reference is at the header of each, right? >> > One not one in first sentence. Insert hurt between not & when in last > sentence. > > I'm doing patch -p *.diff and the process is taking some time. What am I doing wrong?