From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Oct 3 10:43:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F41E38160; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com) Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [91.220.196.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB0B46E592; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com) Received: from [10.9.9.127] (helo=rmmprod05.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzKfd-0001tg-Kn; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:43:25 +0200 Received: from mail by rmmprod05.runbox with local (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzKfd-0004KK-Ik; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:43:25 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [Authenticated user (846156)] by runbox.com with http (RMM6); Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:43:25 GMT From: "Jeffrey Bouquet" To: "O. Hartmann" CC: "FreeBSD CURRENT" , "FreeBSD Ports" Subject: Re: ABI confusion: freebsd:12:x86:64 or ABI: freebsd:12:amd64? Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 03:43:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: RMM6 In-Reply-To: <20171003105124.6b661017@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> Message-Id: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:43:35 -0000 On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:51:24 +0200, "O. Hartmann" w= rote: > When using "poudriere", it seems ABI is freebsd:12:x86:64. When using Fre= eBSD base, it > seems always to be referred to FreeBSD:12:amd64. What now? All non-BSD wo= rld uses x86:64, > FreeBSD is using amd64, but why is this used inconsistently all over the = places? >=20 > I run into trouble setting up some package- and base-servers and ran into= the problem > when deleting - not thinking of this discovered inconsistency - some link= s on the servers > regarding FreeBSD:12:x86:64 (the same is for 11-STABLE). >=20 > Can someone shed some light onto this?=20 >=20 > What am I supposed to use now? The handbook referes to amd64, so I though= t poudriere > would, too.=20 >=20 > Thanks in advance, >=20 > oh > --=20 > O. Hartmann >=20 > Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr > Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Ab= s. 4 BDSG). [ not using poudriere yet ] /me too I think three places [ etc/pkg, /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos, 2nd place in base= , ] fourth: hard coded DESPITE the above in the current DB in var/db/pkg? fifth: derived somehow from uname -a? here: freebsd:12:x86:32 ... when this issue resolved, could it please be added to 'man pkg|poudrier= e|syntch|portmaster?|portupgrade? [ the latter two when developed further = ]'=