From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 14:58:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4AF16A4D0 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:58:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from KVIW12.KVI.nl (KVIW12.KVI.nl [129.125.15.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFCB43D5A for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:58:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from A.S.Usov@KVI.nl) Received: from KVIR52.KVI.nl ("port 43729"@KVIR52.KVI.nl [129.125.37.116]) <01LGJ7MCWN78D41X6P@KVI.nl> for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:57:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from KVIW12.KVI.nl by KVIR52.KVI.nl (AvMailGate-2.0.2-9) id 16351-08ACFC68; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:57:57 +0200 Received: from kvip88 ("port 54351"@KVIP88.KVI.nl [129.125.15.152]) by KVI.nl (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30869) with ESMTP id <01LGJ7MA3C50D41RNS@KVI.nl>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:57:54 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:57:53 +0200 From: "Alexander S. Usov" In-reply-to: <417FA1CB.2000601@withagen.nl> To: Willem Jan Withagen Message-id: <200410271657.53308.A.S.Usov@kvi.nl> Organization: KVI MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.7 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.2-9; AVE: 6.28.0.12; VDF: 6.28.0.41; host: kvi.nl) References: <200410271444.04324.A.S.Usov@kvi.nl> <417FA1CB.2000601@withagen.nl> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-RC1 poor ATA perfomance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:58:05 -0000 On Wednesday 27 October 2004 15:25, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Arrrggghhhh, please not all over again. > > We've just sort of terminated the previous thread about this: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-October/040474.html > And it is a LONG thread. > > One of the more essentail remarks made bij PHK was that this type of > testing is close to no use/good. And to be honest: previously discussed > number were even worse. And were probably dues to hardware which was > designed/backed on monday-morning. I agree, except when it happens to FreeBSD only. > First problem is that you need to determine what you want to do with your > system. > Please read the thread. As it was suggested I will give a try to PREEMPTION before continuing this thread. -- Best regards, Alexander.